Poetry in Motion?: Interrogating the Respective Merits of Flow, Stasis and Resonance as States Conducive to Artistic Research
Darla Crispin
For artistic researchers, practitioners and pedagogues, the sense of immersion and mastery implied by achieving a state of flow is highly desirable, and we rejoice at numerous examples of this in the arts. But motion, with its attendant properties of momentum and speed, can sometimes act as a counterfeit for true reflection: a relentless addiction to flow can drown out much of life and may be less progressive than it first appears. So, how do we develop the necessary discernment to distinguish between its positive and negative aspects, and why does it matter to do so? Using live and recorded audio-visual materials, this keynote address expands upon ideas of flow, stasis and resonance in relation to knowledge-generation, with a view to providing some fresh ideas about artistic research, its current state(s), possible pitfalls and continued promise.
Keynote Address: Poetry in Motion? – Interrogating the Respective Merits of Flow, Stasis and Resonance as States Conducive to Artistic Research
Darla Crispin
The concept of ‘flow’ is one that, for modern thinkers, was first popularised by Mihaly Csikszentmihalyi (1990). Widely adopted towards the millennial turn, it has been expanded upon more recently by Jeanne Nakamura and others (2010 onward). Throughout this process, flow has been presented as an almost invariable ‘good’ and, indeed, an inevitable aspect of the conveyance of knowledge. For artistic researchers, practitioners and pedagogues, the sense of immersion and mastery implied by achieving a state of flow is highly desirable, and we rejoice at numerous examples of this in the arts. But motion, with its attendant properties of momentum and speed, can sometimes act as a counterfeit for true reflection: a relentless addiction to flow can drown out much of life and may be less progressive than it first appears. Furthermore, the apparent profundity of flow-based immersion can all-too-easily be mimicked by stolid self-obsession and even, narcissism. So, how do we develop the necessary discernment to distinguish between its positive and negative aspects, and why does it matter to do so?
One way is to consider what happens when ‘the machine stops’ (E. M. Forster, 1909) and to face full-on the phenomenon of ‘stasis’, with its connotations of silencing and a sense of nothingness. The Covid 19 pandemic has given us an unprecedented opportunity to do so, and for artists amongst others, contemplating a world in which dynamic interaction is suddenly severely curtailed seems a responsible move. Although the website for this conference rightly and optimistically states that the pandemic demonstrated the resilience of humanity, and even, “…some new streams of artistic expression”, there can also be merit in ‘staying with the trouble’ for longer (Haraway 2016). It may be beneficial to bear the pain, to consider the costs in the terms that speak to us, and then to ask what we might glean from these periodic cessations the flow of existence – and how we might respond.
One strand that emerges from this kind of reflection in recovery is a return to the ‘here and now’, in which we may strive to become fully present and to act, whether through artistic, social, cultural or political means, in a state in which resonance emerges: a motion that also – and paradoxically - allows us to be still, should that be needful. The instrumental ‘gong’ that is also a focus of this conference can be imagined as just such a call for attention - like the bell that tolls or the trumpet that is sounded. But the special nature of the gong’s resonant waves and their rich spectrum of frequencies seems to require a different response from us: one that emphasises presence, reflection and contemplation, alongside our action, our moving forward, our progress.
Using live and recorded audio-visual materials, this lecture will expand upon ideas of flow, stasis and resonance in relation to knowledge-generation, with a view to providing some fresh ideas about artistic research, its current state(s), possible pitfalls and continued promise. The three-part lecture should take approximately 45 minutes as a whole, with 15 additional minutes for open discussion.
About Darla Crispin
Darla Crispin is a pianist, scholar, lecturer and academic leader who has worked in all these fields in a variety of countries, most notably Canada, the UK, The Netherlands, Belgium and Norway. Now pursuing her independent research projects, her most recent post, which she held until 2021, was as Vice Rector for Research & Artistic Development and Director of the Arne Nordheim Centre for Artistic Research (NordART) at the Norwegian Academy of Music (NMH), Oslo.
Born in British Columbia, Canada, Darla took her BMus at the University of Victoria before moving to the UK for her advanced studies. She gained a Concert Recital Diploma from the Guildhall School of Music & Drama, London and an MMus and PhD in Historical Musicology from King’s College, London. After a period working professionally with a variety of contemporary music ensembles in The Netherlands, she turned her emphasis to teaching and scholarship. She was responsible for developing postgraduate programmes at the Guildhall School and, later, at the Royal College of Music, where she established, and was the first Head of, the RCM Graduate School, being granted the title of HonRCM in 2009.
Darla’s research has focussed upon musical modernity, and especially on the music of the Second Viennese School. Her most recent work examines this repertoire through the prism of artistic research in music, a process which was reinforced through her work as a Research Fellow at the Orpheus Research Centre in Music [ORCiM] from 2008 to 2013. She is sought after for her experience in the developing field of artistic research, having published many articles and delivered numerous conference papers and international presentations. Her books include Artistic Experimentation in Music: An Anthology, edited with Bob Gilmore (Leuven University Press 2014), and The Artistic Turn: A Manifesto (Orpheus Institute 2009), a collaborative volume with Kathleen Coessens and Anne Douglas. Her most recently commissioned work was a creative presentation of artistic research work through the exposition format, in a piece entitled ‘Paths of Precarity: Reflections on Fractured Passages’ (2023) within the NMH project, ‘Performing Precarity’, led by Ellen Ugelvik and Jennifer Torrence.